Forums:Merging articles: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary |
(Added reply) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Most probably because it's time-consuming (as you mention).--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 10:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | :Most probably because it's time-consuming (as you mention).--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 10:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Right, I'm bushed. But I have reduced the number of pages that need merging by around 20. There is not much left, so if anywone does give me a hand we can have all of these articles gone by tomorrow. | ::Right, I'm bushed. But I have reduced the number of pages that need merging by around 20. There is not much left, so if anywone does give me a hand we can have all of these articles gone by tomorrow. | ||
:::I've held off as I still hope someday to have articles for every Quenya, Sindarin, etc. word, and if that's the case most of the merge candidates become worth keeping. But I think I'm on my own with that opinion :) --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 03:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:45, 15 February 2013
Tolkien Gateway > Forums > Merging articles
Now, this is very annoying and time consuming, but I have merged quite a lot of articles which have been flagged for a very long amount of time. Why have they been left? —Unsigned comment by Reallyfat (talk • contribs).
- Most probably because it's time-consuming (as you mention).--Morgan 10:04, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Right, I'm bushed. But I have reduced the number of pages that need merging by around 20. There is not much left, so if anywone does give me a hand we can have all of these articles gone by tomorrow.
- I've held off as I still hope someday to have articles for every Quenya, Sindarin, etc. word, and if that's the case most of the merge candidates become worth keeping. But I think I'm on my own with that opinion :) --Hyarion 03:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
