Talk:878 AD: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 30 May 2015 by Mith
No edit summary |
(I'm not a fan either) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Then place them in a different category from the real-world articles. Besides, 878 AD isn't really close to any other real-world time frame on this site. However, the Notion Club Papers' dates could cause a little problem. [[User:Woolly Mammoth|Woolly Mammoth]] 16:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC) | :Then place them in a different category from the real-world articles. Besides, 878 AD isn't really close to any other real-world time frame on this site. However, the Notion Club Papers' dates could cause a little problem. [[User:Woolly Mammoth|Woolly Mammoth]] 16:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
::Agree with KA. Aside from the "AD" in the article title, this will create mess that will be difficult to untangle; I'm also not sure how many people are going to come to Tolkien Gateway and search for "878 AD". I think in this instance Wikipedia is a better place to send readers. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 17:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:30, 30 May 2015
Not sure I agree with having fictional events on our real-world date articles. What do others think? -- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 16:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Then place them in a different category from the real-world articles. Besides, 878 AD isn't really close to any other real-world time frame on this site. However, the Notion Club Papers' dates could cause a little problem. Woolly Mammoth 16:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- Agree with KA. Aside from the "AD" in the article title, this will create mess that will be difficult to untangle; I'm also not sure how many people are going to come to Tolkien Gateway and search for "878 AD". I think in this instance Wikipedia is a better place to send readers. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 17:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
