Talk:Dan Smith: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 28 September 2014 by Mith in topic Website
(Fonts have been taken down by Tolkien Estate)
(Disagree)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Dan==
==Dan==
Looks like the Tolkien Estate sent Dan Smith a DMCA takedown, his site is blank and the download links have been removed. [[Special:Contributions/67.1.216.141|67.1.216.141]] 00:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


Shouldn't this page be at [[Dan Smith]] proper? That's how he's usually called, isn't it? -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 08:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't this page be at [[Dan Smith]] proper? That's how he's usually called, isn't it? -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 08:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Line 7: Line 5:


::Good luck on JRRT, then ;). In the case of persons, it's the common name, rather than the full name. -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 18:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
::Good luck on JRRT, then ;). In the case of persons, it's the common name, rather than the full name. -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 18:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
==Website==
Looks like the Tolkien Estate sent Dan Smith a DMCA takedown, his site is blank and the download links have been removed. [[Special:Contributions/67.1.216.141|67.1.216.141]] 00:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
:I'm not sure on what basis you can suggest that. Even if his website has been taken down [http://www.acondia.com/fonts/ which it hasn't] how would you know if the Estate (or anyone else) had been involved? --{{User:Mith/sig}} 09:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:08, 28 September 2014

Dan

Shouldn't this page be at Dan Smith proper? That's how he's usually called, isn't it? -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 08:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I thought that article titles present the 'official' name. Sage 10:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good luck on JRRT, then ;). In the case of persons, it's the common name, rather than the full name. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 18:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Website

Looks like the Tolkien Estate sent Dan Smith a DMCA takedown, his site is blank and the download links have been removed. 67.1.216.141 00:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not sure on what basis you can suggest that. Even if his website has been taken down which it hasn't how would you know if the Estate (or anyone else) had been involved? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 09:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]