Talk:Findis: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 16 February 2019 by Mith in topic Etymology?
No edit summary |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:It would, at most, be hair-woman. "Hairy" is a rather liberal interpretation. --{{User:Ederchil/sig}} 19:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC) | :It would, at most, be hair-woman. "Hairy" is a rather liberal interpretation. --{{User:Ederchil/sig}} 19:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
::I think if the name is simply a compound of the two parents it's a little silly to give a translation: it would obviously create a silly unusual "meaning" if you mash the two together. I think we remove the translation (unless one can be sourced), and just direct people to the other two articles for more information. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 19:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:51, 16 February 2019
Etymology?[edit source]
After looking at what Ryan Einstein wrote, I'm not so sure that "hairy woman" is the best translation...trying to figure something out. Thoughts? --Holdwine Meriadoc (Talk/Contribs/Edits)
- It would, at most, be hair-woman. "Hairy" is a rather liberal interpretation. --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 19:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- I think if the name is simply a compound of the two parents it's a little silly to give a translation: it would obviously create a silly unusual "meaning" if you mash the two together. I think we remove the translation (unless one can be sourced), and just direct people to the other two articles for more information. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 19:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)