Talk:Hobgoblins: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 23 April 2022 by Mord
No edit summary
m (you can sign your talk page comments with --~~~~)
Line 1: Line 1:
In my edition, the citation is : "goblins, hobgoblins, and rest of the worst description." not "orcs of worst" ; is it an old edition ? {{unsigned|Erendis}}
In my edition, the citation is : "goblins, hobgoblins, and rest of the worst description." not "orcs of worst" ; is it an old edition ? {{unsigned|Erendis}}
:I don't have every revision of ''The Hobbit'' to hand, but I dug out ''The Annotated Hobbit'' (1988) and it suggests that the original text from the 1937 edition was "goblins, hobgoblins, and orcs of the worst description." My digital copy of the 50th anniversary edition by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (with 1987 Foreword by CJRT and 2001 Note on the Text by Douglas A. Anderson) has the "orcs" phrasing. I have also seen the "rest" phrasing floating about in various digital editions of questionable provenance, but I don't know when this change was made to the text, or by whom, deliberately or no, nor do I know when it was reverted. What edition do you have? --[[Special:Contributions/Mord|Mord]] 18:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
:I don't have every revision of ''The Hobbit'' to hand, but I dug out ''The Annotated Hobbit'' (1988) and it suggests that the original text from the 1937 edition was "goblins, hobgoblins, and orcs of the worst description." My digital copy of the 50th anniversary edition by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (with 1987 Foreword by CJRT and 2001 Note on the Text by Douglas A. Anderson) has the "orcs" phrasing. I have also seen the "rest" phrasing floating about in various digital editions of questionable provenance, but I don't know when this change was made to the text, or by whom, deliberately or no, nor do I know when it was reverted. What edition do you have? --[[Special:Contributions/Mord|Mord]] 18:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 
::A "digital edition of questionable provenance" I guess ^^ Thank you for your answer :) {{unsigned|Erendis}}
A "digital edition of questionable provenance" I guess ^^ Thank you for your answer :)

Revision as of 07:49, 25 April 2022

In my edition, the citation is : "goblins, hobgoblins, and rest of the worst description." not "orcs of worst" ; is it an old edition ? Unsigned comment by Erendis (talk • contribs).

I don't have every revision of The Hobbit to hand, but I dug out The Annotated Hobbit (1988) and it suggests that the original text from the 1937 edition was "goblins, hobgoblins, and orcs of the worst description." My digital copy of the 50th anniversary edition by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (with 1987 Foreword by CJRT and 2001 Note on the Text by Douglas A. Anderson) has the "orcs" phrasing. I have also seen the "rest" phrasing floating about in various digital editions of questionable provenance, but I don't know when this change was made to the text, or by whom, deliberately or no, nor do I know when it was reverted. What edition do you have? --Mord 18:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
A "digital edition of questionable provenance" I guess ^^ Thank you for your answer :) Unsigned comment by Erendis (talk • contribs).