Talk:Lalaith: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 18 June 2010 by Mith in topic Name
KingAragorn (talk | contribs) m (moved Talk:Urwen Lalaith to Talk:Lalaith) |
KingAragorn (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Name== | ==Name== | ||
This article's name has been bothering me for a while. Shouldn't it be better at | This article's name has been bothering me for a while. Shouldn't it be better at {{redlink|Urwen Lalaith}}? -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 04:39, 10 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Oh, yes. It should. That way it would "stand in line" with her brother and sister. ~~ [[User:Þelma|Þelma]] 09:26, 10 August 2008 (EDT) | :Oh, yes. It should. That way it would "stand in line" with her brother and sister. ~~ [[User:Þelma|Þelma]] 09:26, 10 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
::The name's been bothering me, too! [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Urwen_Lalaith|Editors seem to be confused as to how to refer to this character]], and I don't think calling her both Urwen and Lalaith is really necessary. But I'm not convinced either way: I think we should have the discussion though. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 08:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC) | ::The name's been bothering me, too! [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Urwen_Lalaith|Editors seem to be confused as to how to refer to this character]], and I don't think calling her both Urwen and Lalaith is really necessary. But I'm not convinced either way: I think we should have the discussion though. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 08:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:51, 6 January 2012
Name
This article's name has been bothering me for a while. Shouldn't it be better at Urwen Lalaith[former link]? -- Ederchil 04:39, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
- Oh, yes. It should. That way it would "stand in line" with her brother and sister. ~~ Þelma 09:26, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
- The name's been bothering me, too! Editors seem to be confused as to how to refer to this character, and I don't think calling her both Urwen and Lalaith is really necessary. But I'm not convinced either way: I think we should have the discussion though. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 08:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)