Talk:Lalaith: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 18 June 2010 by Mith in topic Name
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Name==
==Name==
This article's name has been bothering me for a while. Shouldn't it be better at [[Urwen Lalaith]]? -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 04:39, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
This article's name has been bothering me for a while. Shouldn't it be better at {{redlink|Urwen Lalaith}}? -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 04:39, 10 August 2008 (EDT)


:Oh, yes. It should. That way it would "stand in line" with her brother and sister. ~~ [[User:Þelma|Þelma]] 09:26, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
:Oh, yes. It should. That way it would "stand in line" with her brother and sister. ~~ [[User:Þelma|Þelma]] 09:26, 10 August 2008 (EDT)


::The name's been bothering me, too! [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Urwen_Lalaith|Editors seem to be confused as to how to refer to this character]], and I don't think calling her both Urwen and Lalaith is really necessary. But I'm not convinced either way: I think we should have the discussion though. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 08:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
::The name's been bothering me, too! [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Urwen_Lalaith|Editors seem to be confused as to how to refer to this character]], and I don't think calling her both Urwen and Lalaith is really necessary. But I'm not convinced either way: I think we should have the discussion though. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 08:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:51, 6 January 2012

Name

This article's name has been bothering me for a while. Shouldn't it be better at Urwen Lalaith[former link]? -- Ederchil 04:39, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

Oh, yes. It should. That way it would "stand in line" with her brother and sister. ~~ Þelma 09:26, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
The name's been bothering me, too! Editors seem to be confused as to how to refer to this character, and I don't think calling her both Urwen and Lalaith is really necessary. But I'm not convinced either way: I think we should have the discussion though. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 08:55, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]