Talk:Tolkien Gateway

Things to add in (notes to myself and others):

• Negotiations with TORn (2007? 2008?);
• Earliest history about which we know little;
• Growth in members (I have this); (see Tolkien Gateway:Membership Growth)
• Growth in articles (I don't have this);
• Important events in community (within history, not separate section);
• Screenshots of TG. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 16:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

By 'Negotiations with TORn (2007? 2008?)' do you mean the email exchanges I had with them? I can post them here if you like. -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  18:51, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

It's up to you, you can do. (I've finished doing what I can with this article, now, so hoping others will add/change as they see fit.) --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 19:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I might do it when I get time. -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  22:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Praise

GREAT article Mith! Good work! :D -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  22:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikifactor

Should we mention in this article that our WikiFactor is 39? --Amroth 11:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

It might be worth it. It says here that we're WikiFactor 32 (not 39, as you said) and they've classed us as a vibrant wiki. Although it still classes us an an OpenEdit wiki, when we're not (for the time being at least). -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  12:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

The last time they updated that was in May 2010, I've calculated the new Wikifactor (with Popular Pages) which is 39. --Amroth 12:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Edit: Just to let you know I updated their page a bit. --Amroth 12:25, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Just wondering, why did you take us down from vibrant to active, Amroth? — Mithrennaith 05:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

+1 on that question. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 07:32, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

According to this list, a wiki is vibrant when it is more then active. I don't think there are that much edits to be a wiki that is more then active. But if you don't agree, go ahead and change it. --Amroth 08:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)