Talk:Tolkien Gateway: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 28 June 2011 by Mithrennaith in topic Wikifactor
m (→Wikifactor: edit) |
Mithrennaith (talk | contribs) (→Wikifactor: why take us down a peg?) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::Edit: Just to let you know I updated [http://wikiindex.org/Tolkien_Gateway their page] a bit. --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 12:25, 27 June 2011 (UTC) | ::Edit: Just to let you know I updated [http://wikiindex.org/Tolkien_Gateway their page] a bit. --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 12:25, 27 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::Just wondering, why did you take us down from [http://wikiindex.org/Category:Vibrant vibrant] to [http://wikiindex.org/Category:Active active], Amroth? — [[User:Mithrennaith|Mithrennaith]] 05:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:18, 28 June 2011
Things to add in (notes to myself and others):
- Negotiations with TORn (2007? 2008?);
- Earliest history about which we know little;
Growth in members (I have this);(see Tolkien Gateway:Membership Growth)- Growth in articles (I don't have this);
Important events in community (within history, not separate section);Screenshots of TG.--Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 16:49, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
By 'Negotiations with TORn (2007? 2008?)' do you mean the email exchanges I had with them? I can post them here if you like. -- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 18:51, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- It's up to you, you can do. (I've finished doing what I can with this article, now, so hoping others will add/change as they see fit.) --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 19:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- I might do it when I get time. -- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 22:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Praise
GREAT article Mith! Good work! :D -- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 22:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Wikifactor
Should we mention in this article that our WikiFactor is 39? --Amroth 11:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- It might be worth it. It says here that we're WikiFactor 32 (not 39, as you said) and they've classed us as a vibrant wiki. Although it still classes us an an OpenEdit wiki, when we're not (for the time being at least). -- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 12:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- The last time they updated that was in May 2010, I've calculated the new Wikifactor (with Popular Pages) which is 39. --Amroth 12:16, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Edit: Just to let you know I updated their page a bit. --Amroth 12:25, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Just wondering, why did you take us down from vibrant to active, Amroth? — Mithrennaith 05:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)