Talk:Witch-king: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 12 October 2010 by Mith in topic Moved to Witch-king
m (Added unsigned template)
m (→‎Moved to Witch-king: new section)
Line 15: Line 15:


The WK was not killed "by a woman" but by two creatures who were not "man": a woman AND a hobbit, so I added hobbit back into the specific reference to Macbeth. {{unsigned|ElfMaven}}
The WK was not killed "by a woman" but by two creatures who were not "man": a woman AND a hobbit, so I added hobbit back into the specific reference to Macbeth. {{unsigned|ElfMaven}}
== Moved to Witch-king ==
I would like to propose moving this article to "Witch-king". --{{User:Mith/sig}} 13:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:32, 12 October 2010

Motion Picture Picture

Can we get a picture of The Witch-King in the film adaptation of The Return of the King? -Lord Aragorn1414 14:39, 18 July 2006 (EDT)

Having added a movie adaptation section, I second the motion. --Ted C 11:53, 20 October 2006 (EDT)

Definitely need a new picture, this one is way to childish. Pand.

Featured Article?

This article is surprisingly good. It's good raw material for an FA, maybe with a little more segmentation. --Theoden1 15:41, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

It's very good. And sourced! 3 more votes to go. -- Ederchil 15:57, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

added hobbit again

The WK was not killed "by a woman" but by two creatures who were not "man": a woman AND a hobbit, so I added hobbit back into the specific reference to Macbeth. Unsigned comment by ElfMaven (talk • contribs).

Moved to Witch-king

I would like to propose moving this article to "Witch-king". --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 13:32, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]