Template talk:Rohirrim infobox: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
(Created page with "== Rohir == Can we get rid of it? It's ugly and non-canon. Call it Man of Rohan, with an #if that makes it Woman if Gender=F. --~~~~")
 
(→‎Rohir: Not quite that straightforward...)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Rohir ==
== Rohir ==
Can we get rid of it? It's ugly and non-canon. Call it Man of Rohan, with an #if that makes it Woman if Gender=F. --{{User:Ederchil/sig}} 23:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Can we get rid of it? It's ugly and non-canon. Call it Man of Rohan, with an #if that makes it Woman if Gender=F. --{{User:Ederchil/sig}} 23:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
:I'm not opposed on principle, but the template is used for the ancestors of the Rohirrim such as [[Marhwini]] who wasn't a Man of Rohan (I accept he wasn't a member of the Rohirrim either). What do you suggest? --{{User:Mith/sig}} 12:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:21, 13 April 2015

Rohir

Can we get rid of it? It's ugly and non-canon. Call it Man of Rohan, with an #if that makes it Woman if Gender=F. --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 23:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not opposed on principle, but the template is used for the ancestors of the Rohirrim such as Marhwini who wasn't a Man of Rohan (I accept he wasn't a member of the Rohirrim either). What do you suggest? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 12:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]