Template talk:S: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
(Created page with 'I took the liberty to restructure this template a bit, most notably adding "''Quenta Silmarillion'': X. [chapter name]". Do you reckon this looks better, or should we leave the c…')
 
m (I think chapters look a bit odd)
Line 1: Line 1:
I took the liberty to restructure this template a bit, most notably adding "''Quenta Silmarillion'': X. [chapter name]". Do you reckon this looks better, or should we leave the chapter number out? (Personally I find it quicker to look up a chapter number than to look for the chapter name in the Contents.) --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 16:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
I took the liberty to restructure this template a bit, most notably adding "''Quenta Silmarillion'': X. [chapter name]". Do you reckon this looks better, or should we leave the chapter number out? (Personally I find it quicker to look up a chapter number than to look for the chapter name in the Contents.) --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 16:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
:I'm personally not a fan of including chapter numbers, I think it looks a bit odd. (And it's not what academics do, nor any of our other templates.) --{{User:Mith/sig}} 22:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:11, 17 October 2010

I took the liberty to restructure this template a bit, most notably adding "Quenta Silmarillion: X. [chapter name]". Do you reckon this looks better, or should we leave the chapter number out? (Personally I find it quicker to look up a chapter number than to look for the chapter name in the Contents.) --Morgan 16:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm personally not a fan of including chapter numbers, I think it looks a bit odd. (And it's not what academics do, nor any of our other templates.) --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]