Template talk:S: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
m (I think chapters look a bit odd) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I'm personally not a fan of including chapter numbers, I think it looks a bit odd. (And it's not what academics do, nor any of our other templates.) --{{User:Mith/sig}} 22:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | :I'm personally not a fan of including chapter numbers, I think it looks a bit odd. (And it's not what academics do, nor any of our other templates.) --{{User:Mith/sig}} 22:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
::"not what academics do": True. I'll wait a while to see if anyone else has any opinion, and if not I'll remove it. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 22:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:24, 17 October 2010
I took the liberty to restructure this template a bit, most notably adding "Quenta Silmarillion: X. [chapter name]". Do you reckon this looks better, or should we leave the chapter number out? (Personally I find it quicker to look up a chapter number than to look for the chapter name in the Contents.) --Morgan 16:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm personally not a fan of including chapter numbers, I think it looks a bit odd. (And it's not what academics do, nor any of our other templates.) --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 22:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- "not what academics do": True. I'll wait a while to see if anyone else has any opinion, and if not I'll remove it. --Morgan 22:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
