Tolkien Gateway talk:Featured articles/Nominations: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:


I think we should come up with better criteria for nominating an article. Some people have mentioned pictures, references, and sources as necessary components - I'll agree. Yet saying we cannot use [[J.R.R. Tolkien|this article]] becuase it has no footnotes, when the [[Eriador|Featured Article]] doesn't have any cannot work out. Can we establish a formal list of criteria? --{{User:Breragor/sig}} 00:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
I think we should come up with better criteria for nominating an article. Some people have mentioned pictures, references, and sources as necessary components - I'll agree. Yet saying we cannot use [[J.R.R. Tolkien|this article]] becuase it has no footnotes, when the [[Eriador|Featured Article]] doesn't have any cannot work out. Can we establish a formal list of criteria? --{{User:Breragor/sig}} 00:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
:O.o [[Eriador#References|Eriador has 45 footnotes]]. But yes, I agree, it's a good idea to establish a list of criteria. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 10:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:59, 2 March 2011

Nomination limits

Let's try to hold the nominations down to 2 or 3 at a time. Hyarion wants to concentrate on bringing more articles up to standards, and I agree.--Theoden1 16:17, 9 June 2008 (EDT)


Criteria

I think we should come up with better criteria for nominating an article. Some people have mentioned pictures, references, and sources as necessary components - I'll agree. Yet saying we cannot use this article becuase it has no footnotes, when the Featured Article doesn't have any cannot work out. Can we establish a formal list of criteria? --Breragor (TalkContribsEdits) 00:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

O.o Eriador has 45 footnotes. But yes, I agree, it's a good idea to establish a list of criteria. -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  10:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]