Tolkien Gateway talk:Featured articles/Nominations: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
KingAragorn (talk | contribs) (→Criteria: O.o) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:O.o [[Eriador#References|Eriador has 45 footnotes]]. But yes, I agree, it's a good idea to establish a list of criteria. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 10:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC) | :O.o [[Eriador#References|Eriador has 45 footnotes]]. But yes, I agree, it's a good idea to establish a list of criteria. --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 10:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
::I recall coming up with a list a year or so back, but I can't recall where it is. -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 12:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:27, 2 March 2011
Nomination limits
Let's try to hold the nominations down to 2 or 3 at a time. Hyarion wants to concentrate on bringing more articles up to standards, and I agree.--Theoden1 16:17, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Criteria
I think we should come up with better criteria for nominating an article. Some people have mentioned pictures, references, and sources as necessary components - I'll agree. Yet saying we cannot use this article becuase it has no footnotes, when the Featured Article doesn't have any cannot work out. Can we establish a formal list of criteria? --Breragor • (Talk • Contribs • Edits) 00:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- O.o Eriador has 45 footnotes. But yes, I agree, it's a good idea to establish a list of criteria. -- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 10:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
