Tolkien Gateway talk:Meetings/7 October 2012 - Revision history

KingAragorn: /* Ideas for agenda */

2012-10-07T11:59:55Z

Ideas for agenda

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 7 October 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*Return to the discussion of "Category:Greco-Roman names" (see [[Category talk:Greco-Roman names]]).--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 15:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)		*Return to the discussion of "Category:Greco-Roman names" (see [[Category talk:Greco-Roman names]]).--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 15:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
	*I thought enriching geographical articles with regional maps. See [[Dunland]] and [[Glanduin]]. So far my edits were derived from maps by Fonstad but such maps are tagged as of uncertain copyright and therefore candidates for deletion; on the same time, all maps are tagged with a fair-use tag. Can we discuss the fate of such maps; the availability of Fonstad's maps on TG; or which maps we might use? [[User:Sage\|Sage]] 11:20, 7 October 2012 (UTC)		*I thought enriching geographical articles with regional maps. See [[Dunland]] and [[Glanduin]]. So far my edits were derived from maps by Fonstad but such maps are tagged as of uncertain copyright and therefore candidates for deletion; on the same time, all maps are tagged with a fair-use tag. Can we discuss the fate of such maps; the availability of Fonstad's maps on TG; or which maps we might use? [[User:Sage\|Sage]] 11:20, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
		+	**Can you make the meeting?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 11:59, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

	==Discussion==		==Discussion==

	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

Sage: /* Ideas for agenda */

2012-10-07T11:20:30Z

Ideas for agenda

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:20, 7 October 2012
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*Naming conventions for non-artist images.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 16:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)		*Naming conventions for non-artist images.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 16:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
	*Return to the discussion of "Category:Greco-Roman names" (see [[Category talk:Greco-Roman names]]).--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 15:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)		*Return to the discussion of "Category:Greco-Roman names" (see [[Category talk:Greco-Roman names]]).--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 15:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
		+	*I thought enriching geographical articles with regional maps. See [[Dunland]] and [[Glanduin]]. So far my edits were derived from maps by Fonstad but such maps are tagged as of uncertain copyright and therefore candidates for deletion; on the same time, all maps are tagged with a fair-use tag. Can we discuss the fate of such maps; the availability of Fonstad's maps on TG; or which maps we might use? [[User:Sage\|Sage]] 11:20, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

	==Discussion==		==Discussion==

	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

Ederchil at 09:33, 7 October 2012

2012-10-07T09:33:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:33, 7 October 2012
Line 5:		Line 5:
	# [[User:Amroth\|Amroth]] (probally) 12:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)		# [[User:Amroth\|Amroth]] (probally) 12:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
	# {{User:Mith/sig}} 09:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)		# {{User:Mith/sig}} 09:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
−		+	# --{{User:Ederchil/sig}} 09:33, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
	==Non-attendees==		==Non-attendees==

Mith: /* Attendees */ Attending

2012-10-07T09:11:36Z

Attendees: Attending

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 7 October 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	# {{User:KingAragorn/sig}}		# {{User:KingAragorn/sig}}
	# [[User:Amroth\|Amroth]] (probally) 12:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)		# [[User:Amroth\|Amroth]] (probally) 12:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
		+	# {{User:Mith/sig}} 09:11, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

	==Non-attendees==		==Non-attendees==

Morgan: /* Ideas for agenda */

2012-09-17T19:43:21Z

Ideas for agenda

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:43, 17 September 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*[[Forum:Journal/book covers\|Journal/book covers]] - a proposal to change our policy towards how we handle covers.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)		*[[Forum:Journal/book covers\|Journal/book covers]] - a proposal to change our policy towards how we handle covers.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
	*I recently had the idea that we should include a list of reviews for books on their respective articles. This raised the question of where to put it. I first considered the "See also" section and then thought that perhaps a "Further reading" would be more appropriate. Morgan also suggested that it could go under "External links". What do you think?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)		*I recently had the idea that we should include a list of reviews for books on their respective articles. This raised the question of where to put it. I first considered the "See also" section and then thought that perhaps a "Further reading" would be more appropriate. Morgan also suggested that it could go under "External links". What do you think?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
		+	**''Below'' "External links", in order to avoid misunderstanding! ;-) --[[User:Morgan\|Morgan]] 19:43, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
	*We don't seem to have any coherent plan for the order of sections and templates at the bottom of pages (i.e. See also, sequence templates etc.). There's a general idea of course, but we should consider agreeing on a consistent style.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)		*We don't seem to have any coherent plan for the order of sections and templates at the bottom of pages (i.e. See also, sequence templates etc.). There's a general idea of course, but we should consider agreeing on a consistent style.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
	*Naming conventions for non-artist images.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 16:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)		*Naming conventions for non-artist images.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 16:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

KingAragorn: /* Ideas for agenda */

2012-09-17T15:46:18Z

Ideas for agenda

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 17 September 2012
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*We don't seem to have any coherent plan for the order of sections and templates at the bottom of pages (i.e. See also, sequence templates etc.). There's a general idea of course, but we should consider agreeing on a consistent style.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)		*We don't seem to have any coherent plan for the order of sections and templates at the bottom of pages (i.e. See also, sequence templates etc.). There's a general idea of course, but we should consider agreeing on a consistent style.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
	*Naming conventions for non-artist images.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 16:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)		*Naming conventions for non-artist images.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 16:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
		+	*Return to the discussion of "Category:Greco-Roman names" (see [[Category talk:Greco-Roman names]]).--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 15:46, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

	==Discussion==		==Discussion==

	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

KingAragorn: /* Ideas for agenda */

2012-09-08T16:51:52Z

Ideas for agenda

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 8 September 2012
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*I recently had the idea that we should include a list of reviews for books on their respective articles. This raised the question of where to put it. I first considered the "See also" section and then thought that perhaps a "Further reading" would be more appropriate. Morgan also suggested that it could go under "External links". What do you think?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)		*I recently had the idea that we should include a list of reviews for books on their respective articles. This raised the question of where to put it. I first considered the "See also" section and then thought that perhaps a "Further reading" would be more appropriate. Morgan also suggested that it could go under "External links". What do you think?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
	*We don't seem to have any coherent plan for the order of sections and templates at the bottom of pages (i.e. See also, sequence templates etc.). There's a general idea of course, but we should consider agreeing on a consistent style.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)		*We don't seem to have any coherent plan for the order of sections and templates at the bottom of pages (i.e. See also, sequence templates etc.). There's a general idea of course, but we should consider agreeing on a consistent style.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
		+	*Naming conventions for non-artist images.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 16:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

	==Discussion==		==Discussion==

	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

Amroth: /* Attendees */

2012-09-05T12:53:59Z

Attendees

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:53, 5 September 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Attendees==		==Attendees==
	# {{User:KingAragorn/sig}}		# {{User:KingAragorn/sig}}
−	# --[[~~Special~~:~~Contributions/82.176.211.225~~\|~~82.176.211.225~~]] 12:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)	+	# [[User:Amroth\|Amroth]] (probally) 12:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

	==Non-attendees==		==Non-attendees==

82.176.211.225: /* Attendees */

2012-09-05T12:52:50Z

Attendees

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:52, 5 September 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Attendees==		==Attendees==
	# {{User:KingAragorn/sig}}		# {{User:KingAragorn/sig}}
		+	# --[[Special:Contributions/82.176.211.225\|82.176.211.225]] 12:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

	==Non-attendees==		==Non-attendees==

KingAragorn: /* Ideas for agenda */ Ideas.

2012-09-04T21:01:28Z

Ideas for agenda: Ideas.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:01, 4 September 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:

	==Ideas for agenda==		==Ideas for agenda==
		+	*A discussion to bring people up to date on the Tengwar extension.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
		+	*[[Forum:Journal/book covers\|Journal/book covers]] - a proposal to change our policy towards how we handle covers.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
		+	*I recently had the idea that we should include a list of reviews for books on their respective articles. This raised the question of where to put it. I first considered the "See also" section and then thought that perhaps a "Further reading" would be more appropriate. Morgan also suggested that it could go under "External links". What do you think?--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
		+	*We don't seem to have any coherent plan for the order of sections and templates at the bottom of pages (i.e. See also, sequence templates etc.). There's a general idea of course, but we should consider agreeing on a consistent style.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:01, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

	==Discussion==		==Discussion==

	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__