Talk:Errantry: Difference between revisions
m (my bad, forgot to sign) |
(Errantry vs. Song of Earendil) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Well, if we built in a heavy caveat emptor in the Bestiary article, and put up a noncanon tag on every reference to it, shouldn't that be enough? [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 11:43, 14 January 2008 (EST) | :Well, if we built in a heavy caveat emptor in the Bestiary article, and put up a noncanon tag on every reference to it, shouldn't that be enough? [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 11:43, 14 January 2008 (EST) | ||
==''Song of Earendil'' vs. ''Errantry''== | |||
‘A much shorter version would be included in ''The Fellowship of the Ring'': the ''Song of Eärendil''.’ | |||
Careful comparison has led me to believe – and I think this belief reasonably well-founded – that the ''Song of Earendil'' is in fact much '''longer''' than ''Errantry'' ;-) But the relationship of these two poems deserves a much lengthier discussion anyway, that’s why I didn’t edit this myself straightaway. [[Special:Contributions/134.93.50.217|134.93.50.217]] 23:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:52, 27 April 2009
Should "Dumbledor" have a seperate article? --Narfil Palùrfalas 13:52, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
- I think so. I've thrown up a stub over at Dumbledors, the plural to go with the standard of Orcs, Men, Elves, etc. --Hyarion 14:23, 20 June 2006 (EDT)
Dumbledor
I'm not entirely comfortable with referencing David Day in either this article or Dumbledors to be honest. I can't actually find any other source to back up his claim, can anyone else? Loads of websites say that same thing but they all reference David Day (which I don't think is healthy). --Mith 11:37, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Well, if we built in a heavy caveat emptor in the Bestiary article, and put up a noncanon tag on every reference to it, shouldn't that be enough? Ederchil 11:43, 14 January 2008 (EST)
Song of Earendil vs. Errantry
‘A much shorter version would be included in The Fellowship of the Ring: the Song of Eärendil.’
Careful comparison has led me to believe – and I think this belief reasonably well-founded – that the Song of Earendil is in fact much longer than Errantry ;-) But the relationship of these two poems deserves a much lengthier discussion anyway, that’s why I didn’t edit this myself straightaway. 134.93.50.217 23:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
