Talk:Rhovanion: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 24 March 2011 by Dwarf Lord in topic Naming
(→‎Naming: new section)
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


Wouldn't it be better to simply call this '''Rhovanion'''? Also shouldn't '''Rhovanion (Realm)''' be [[Rhovanion (realm)]]? --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 22:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be better to simply call this '''Rhovanion'''? Also shouldn't '''Rhovanion (Realm)''' be [[Rhovanion (realm)]]? --{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 22:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Sure.  We could name the other Kingdom of Rhovanion which I think makes more sense. --[[User:Dwarf Lord|Dwarf Lord]] 22:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:19, 24 March 2011

I think this page should be deleted and put in the Wilderland page. For Rhovanion usually refers to the realm of the North-men. Also the category Rhovanion should be changed to Wilderland too. That one I can take the blame for since I created it. --Dwarf Lord 17:10, 6 July 2007 (EDT)

I prefer Rhovanion, merely because it's called such on Tolkien's maps. I could be wrong, but I think it's more commonly used anyway. All the same, I don't think it's that big a deal. If we decide want to move it to Wilderland, I won't object. --Narfil Palùrfalas 21:38, 6 July 2007 (EDT)

Not sure where to start

There are soo many problems with this page I'm not sure where to even begin. It, needs a template, organized sections ect. --Dwarf Lord 00:17, 5 April 2008 (EDT)

The problem with Wilderland is that it's, well, wild. It's not really organised in the same fashion as that other unorganised land, Eriador. I mean, "History of Rhovanion" would include history (or a summary of "History of") of Dale, Esgaroth, Erebor, the Woodland Realm, the Hobbits, the Wood-men, the North-men, the Skinchangers, the Orcs and Wargs, et cetera. -- Ederchil 02:55, 5 April 2008 (EDT)

This page can look just as good as the Gondor, Numenor, and Rohan pages if we're diligent. The Eriador page is no different from this one either. It needs some serious expansion and reorganization. Both these pages will be a mass undertaking though. --Dwarf Lord 14:15, 5 April 2008 (EDT)

Capital

Shouldn't this article be called Rhovanion (region) without the capital? It's not in Region, after all. -- Ederchil 16:44, 13 July 2008 (EDT)

Naming

Wouldn't it be better to simply call this Rhovanion? Also shouldn't Rhovanion (Realm) be Rhovanion (realm)? -- KingAragorn  talk  contribs  edits  email  22:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure. We could name the other Kingdom of Rhovanion which I think makes more sense. --Dwarf Lord 22:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]