Talk:Two Trees of Valinor: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 3 July 2011 by Mith
(Where should the info be?) |
m (I don't know) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
These "super"-articles have a certain difficulty: what information is to be mentioned in ''only'' the sub-pages (in this case, Telperion and Laurelin), and what should be mentioned in ''all'' articles (super-page and sub-page)? For example, should we have the variant names for the trees in both this page and in the individual pages for the trees? --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 00:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC) | These "super"-articles have a certain difficulty: what information is to be mentioned in ''only'' the sub-pages (in this case, Telperion and Laurelin), and what should be mentioned in ''all'' articles (super-page and sub-page)? For example, should we have the variant names for the trees in both this page and in the individual pages for the trees? --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 00:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
:I agree this is a problem and I am similarly conflicted about the division of information. Variant names for the trees should be in their respective articles, though. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 11:20, 3 July 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:20, 3 July 2011
These "super"-articles have a certain difficulty: what information is to be mentioned in only the sub-pages (in this case, Telperion and Laurelin), and what should be mentioned in all articles (super-page and sub-page)? For example, should we have the variant names for the trees in both this page and in the individual pages for the trees? --Morgan 00:14, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
