Talk:Waning of Dúnedain: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 8 April 2021 by Tolkienator in topic Move
No edit summary |
Tolkienator (talk | contribs) (It's settled then!) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I think the page should be deleted. The content is real, but the concept is fanon. Besides, nothing links here save redirects. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 14:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC) | :I think the page should be deleted. The content is real, but the concept is fanon. Besides, nothing links here save redirects. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 14:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
::I agree with the above 2 points. I'll add the external links to the Dúnedain page but someone has to delete this page once I move the necessary info.--[[User:Tolkienator|Tolkienator]] 22:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:14, 8 April 2021
Move[edit source]
I suggest moving this page to the Dúnedain page due to the section in the latter which is more coherent and sourced.--Tengwar 02:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
This unsourced mess has no merit or value on its own. I agree. The section of the same name in the Dúnedain page clarifies this subject to a considerably better degree.--Tolkienator 12:45, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Either the page should be deleted or the content of the waning section from the Dúnedain page should be copied in here. In any case the External Links section and its links should be copied to the Dúnedain page. The linked articles include a valuable analysis. --Akhorahil 14:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- I think the page should be deleted. The content is real, but the concept is fanon. Besides, nothing links here save redirects. --LorenzoCB 14:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with the above 2 points. I'll add the external links to the Dúnedain page but someone has to delete this page once I move the necessary info.--Tolkienator 22:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
