Tolkien Gateway

Talk:Mallorn 46

Since you really want some feedback:

  1. link some more (if not all) authors. It's really handy when you're updating an author's profile to just click "what links here".
  2. in the case of book reviews, link to the books in question.
  3. as for layout, I would favour a mix of options 2 and 3. In the case of the book reviews, list both article name and book title. Option 1 is a tad bit too crowded.

Hope it helps. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 17:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I know all about linking (as I've done on the Amon Hen issues), I only really wanted to know what form the contents should take.
I do agree with you that Option is too crowded (and I do find it peculiar that the current editor has chosen such a "messy" form in contrast to more usual tables of contents, especially as Mallorn is supposed to be a academic-ish journal); I'll go with your Option 2.5 suggestion and see how it turns out! Thanks for the input.--Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 20:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)